Governments worldwide are struggling to contain a new virus that could have a huge impact on billions of lives worldwide.
The virus is called
TRUTH
Wednesday, 31 July 2024
More than a thousand passages blacked out: Multipolar publishes acquitted RKI protocols in the original
The protocols of the crisis unit of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), which have been released by our magazine, are now made accessible to everyone. The more than 200 documents have been blackened to a considerable extent by the RKI. We are currently suing against the blackening. We invite all interested journalists to co-research.
As Multipolar already reported on the basis of the papers kept secret so far, the tightening of the risk assessment from "moderate" to "high" announced by the RKI in March 2020 was based on all lockdown measures and court rulings - contrary to what has been claimed so far, was not based on a technical assessment of the institute, but on the political instruction of an external actor - whose name is blackened in the protocols.
For a further thorough evaluation of the more than 200 protocols with a total volume of over 1,000 pages, the cooperation of other journalists and researchers is now required. The protocols cover the period from January 2020 to April 2021, since our application under the Freedom of Information Act, on which the later complaint was based, was made in May 2021. The application was:
In accordance with § 1 IFG, Art. 10 ECHR, in the name and in the attached power of attorney (...), we hereby request access in the form of the preparation of copies of all information, regardless of the embodiment,
- All minutes, agendas, participant lists and other notes of the RKI Corona crisis team since its foundation - according to RKI on 6.1.2020 - until 30.4.2021;
- All documents, notes and correspondence (except drafts) of the authority that deal with the planning and convening of the crisis unit in the run-up to the first meeting;
- In particular, all documents and notes (except drafts) that deal with the change of the risk assessment on 17.3.2020 from "moderate" to "high", including correspondence within the RKI as well as between the RKI and the Federal Ministry of Health and, if necessary, other authorities of the Federal Government.
After non-response and bringing a lawsuit, a long tug-of-war followed by our lawyers of the law firm Partsch und Partner with the lawyers of the RKI of the law firm Raue. After the exchange of numerous pleadings by both sides with the Administrative Court of Berlin, this admonished the opposing side in February 2023 to come to an end with the processing and announced that it would "probably grant the lawsuit comprehensively because of the passage-exact presentation of grounds for exclusion that had not yet taken place".
As a result, the RKI presented the protocols heavily blackened in April 2023 - apparently also in order to avoid a verdict of the court. An estimated more than a thousand passages were blackened. The law firm Raue sent a PDF document of more than 1,000 pages, in which each and every one of these blackenings - mostly in a formula - is justified.
The blackening goes so far that sometimes even the simple participation of Minister of Health Jens Spahn in a crisis unit meeting is concealed (Protocol of 3. February 2020, blackening of the first name on the list of participants), although even the ministry itself made its participation public at the time (with photo) on Twitter.
In July 2023, we sued against the blackenings. The lawyers of the RKI insisted on their appropriateness to the court in September, to which our lawyers responded in November. The other side objected again in December. In January 2024, the court finally announced a date for the oral hearing and taking evidence. This is scheduled for Monday, the 6th. May 2024 at 9:30 a.m. in the office building of the Administrative Court of Berlin, Kirchstraße 7. (Aktenzeichen VG 2 K 278/21) (Update 29.4.: The trial is at the request of the RKI lawyers on the 8th July has been moved.)
Our editorial team had originally planned to wait with the publication of the minutes until a judgment of the court was available. However, after the court date was announced at the beginning of this year, we decided to bring forward the publication. We hope that the court will decide in the sense of the greatest possible transparency, so that at best the less or no longer blackened protocols will be available in May - which would be considered an essential step towards the further, overdue, reappraisal of the corona crisis.
Until then, we invite all interested journalists and researchers to thoroughly sift the material and share their findings.
Gunnar Schupelius - My anger : There has never been a "pandemic of the unvaccinated"
26. April 2021: Chancellor Merkel (CDU, m.), the Governing Mayor Müller (SPD, r.) and Bavaria's Prime Minister Söder (CSU) order the extension of the lockdown, which will take place on the 16th. December 2020 was imposed
Photo: Michael Kappeler/dpa
Berlin - Now all corona protocols of the Robert Koch Institute are publicly accessible. They show that the scientists were ignored by politics when the lockdown was ordered with the 3-G and 2-G rules.
The freelance journalist Aya Velázquez has on Platform X the entire protocols of the Corona crisis staff of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) from the years 2020 to 2023 published (rki-transparenzbericht.de). They were leaked to her by a former employee, she explained.
The protocols expose five great falsehoods spread by politics:
First: In the opinion of the RKI, vaccination of children was not necessary at all because children were not seriously endangered by the virus and were not themselves drivers of the waves of infection.
Secondly, AstraZeneca's vaccine was not harmless, as from Federal Ministry of Health announced, but was accompanied by dangerous side effects, which was known long before the vaccine was withdrawn from the market.
Third: The claim of the The Federal Government that people who do not get vaccinated are a danger to others was unfounded and wrong. According to the scientists of the RKI, the "pandemic of the unvaccinated", which was proclaimed by the then Minister of Health Jens Spahn (CDU), never existed. The unvaccinated were no more and nothing less responsible for the spread of the virus than the vaccinated.
Fourthly: The FFP-2 mask requirement was not recommended by the RKI as well as - fifthly - the 3-G rule and the 2-G rule (participation in public life only for vaccinated, tested and recovered - then only for vaccinated and recovered).
Conclusion: Apparently, essential decisions of politics - contrary to what is repeatedly claimed - were by no means scientifically justified.
These decisions were made in the Conference of Prime Ministers of the 16 federal states under the leadership of the then Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU). They all referred to "science." But apparently science was ignored by them.
Where are they now, who ruled like this? Chief consultant Drosten has written a book in which he does not admit a single mistake. Merkel is working on her biography, which is to be published in the autumn. Spahn walks in the Bundestag as if he had never been the responsible Minister of Health. His successor Karl Lauterbach (SPD), who was enthroned in autumn 2021 after he had previously triggered an incredible corona hysteria daily on Twitter (today X), is still in office.
Immersed in the Bundestag is Michael Müller (SPD), the then Governing Mayor of Berlin and Chairman of the Prime Minister's Conference, who campaigned with great harshness for the lockdown and the exclusion of the unvaccinated from social life (G rules).
No one has the courage to take responsibility and honestly work through the corona policy - if only to avoid mistakes in the future. They all have a lot to hide, as the RKI protocols show, which were only released by court order or - as now - are unofficially viewable.
The week's Lockdown files show Boris Johnson feared Britain's second lockdown because he knew the death data was ‘very wrong'; he also wanted to lift the restrictions, but the public ‘wasn't ready'.
Lockdown files message is clear: we must never again give power to power-hungry people (Image: GETTY)
They also reveal that masks in schools were introduced to avoid an argument with Nicola Sturgeon, that care homes were neglected, and the inhumane rules that kept married couples apart were discussed but, despite their devastating effects, were kept anyhow. Why? Because there was no one to challenge the power-hungry government machinery that was out of its depth.
Rules of six were introduced without evidence, but ministers went ahead anyway - it was easier to communicate than a rule of seven, eight or nine.
It was clear that these policies were being made on the hoof, but a silence of science meant they essentially went unchallenged.
When we pointed out that the lockdown in November 2020 was based on misleading data, something Boris Johnson said was “very wrong,” the government still went ahead.
The Lockdown files are littered with flippant remarks, derogatory comments and disdain for the public. Civil servants mocked quarantined holidaymakers, and politicians were “laughing and joking about locking us up.”
But the Lockdown files also show the results of putting medical decisions in the hands of people with no medical decision-making experience or expertise, so long as they were “nice chaps” and went to the right school.
They also reveal what happens when you have impotent advisors who do not challenge the decisions and scientists with ideological viewpoints based on engineering fear and repressive measures. Looking back, ministers such as Gavin Willamson wonder whether they should have resigned - the answer is yes, but it’s a bit late now.
But all along, ministers thought it was “brilliant” the police were fining the public for covid law breaches. But these were ridiculous, repressive laws that were bad for everyone.
We tried our best to counter the corrosive effects of social engineering. We at least managed to stave off the Christmas 2021 “omicron variant” lockdown.
But, emergency powers afforded by the coronavirus act gave power to just a few people and their merry band of advisors who were drunk on the power.
Restrictions, lockdowns and travel measures changed over 200 times in 2020. No one could keep up with the changes. By the time one measure had come in, it was onto the next. For example, the rules on going out – to a pub or a restaurant - were changed 20 times up to September 2020. Many didn’t know the rules and didn’t care. Some statements like “closing the borders with Wales” appeared to have been taken from an episode of Fawlty Towers.
In 2020, Sir Graham Brady MP tabled an amendment requiring a Parliamentary vote "as soon as reasonably practicable" for any new covid measures. He understood the pervasive problems of the coronavirus act that were so damaging to society.
It handed control to the likes of Matt Hancock, who, while revelling in the attention, were threatening the public with £10,000 fines.
Contrast this with Sweden, whose constitution‘prevents interference by ministers of government in affairs that are assigned to various public authorities.’
The Swedish public agencies are set up outside of central government control. So, instead of the UK system, where agencies and their civil servants act as stooges to prop up the government's inadequacies, they get on with doing their job in the public's interest.
Consequently, the Swedish government had limited power to intervene in the ongoing business of its public agencies. A light-touch COVID response was all that was needed to steer us through the pandemic.
This is why we now call for legislation to prevent the Coronavirus Act and any similar Act from ever being enacted again. To avoid individual ministers from having the power to intervene directly in the day-to-day lives of their citizens.
We should also ensure that no government can openly or covertly persecute its citizens, lawfully expressing doubts about its policies. Those who prevented critical debate and parliamentary votes and acted in self-interest should be held accountable for their actions.
We should never again give up our individual rights, and particularly our children’s rights, to individuals who, in haste, created botched policies that will have repercussions for decades to come.
If we don't act swiftly to prevent legislation akin to the Coronavirus Act, there is nothing to stop the debacle of restrictions and lockdowns being handed to a few ministers again.
Professor Carl Heneghan is a clinical epidemiologist and the Director of Oxford University's Centre of Evidence Based Medicine. He is also an urgent care GP. Dr. Tom Jefferson is a medically trained epidemiologist and Senior Associate Tutor at the University of Oxford.
BREAKING: Leaked German RKI Protocols expose the shocking truth of government-sanctioned abuse
The dam has burst. They took away basic human rights, imposed draconian measures and mandatory novel gene injections on humanity, and claimed it was for our health. They lied.
In a shocking revelation, the 4,000-page protocols of the German equivalent of the CDC, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), have been leaked by an anonymous whistleblower of the RKI to the public, exposing the truth behind the government's handling of the pandemic.
Whilst the first insights into the protocols were paid for via a Freedom of Information Act request by the journal Multipolar in March 2024, most relevant passages had been redacted. These protocols, which cover the period from 2020 to 2023, reveal that political decisions were made without scientific basis, leading to the imposition of draconian measures and the unnecessary injection of the public with untested gene therapy.
Recently, Anthony Fauci, responsible for the Covid measures in the US, had admitted that the social distancing rule was completely fabricated and without scientific back up and in another statement, admitted that masks do not work.
In the UK the “Lockdown files” also revealed the results of “putting medical decisions in the hands of people with no medical decision-making experience or expertise, so long as they were ‘nice chaps’ and went to the right school.”
A recent publication states that the three primary causes of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality in the last years are due to mandated measures such as lockdowns, harmful medical interventions such as the use of ventilators, the denial of use of antibiotics and the use of Covid gene injections. In light of this, the German revelations require strict consequences. The study’s authors calculated that Covid-19 vaccine deaths, up to 30 December 2022, number a staggering 16.9 million people.
Unveiling the lies
Sensationally, even one of the German mainstream media tabloids, Bild, reported thatthe leaked RKI protocols expose five major untruths that politicians spread during the pandemic. As you read these, keep in mind the measures that the German people were subjected to: besides mask mandates and social distancing rules, a ‘lockdown of the unvaccinated’ banned people from entering shops, restaurants, schools, bars and other public places, including parks and forests. Compulsory vaccination was imposed on military members and all people working in the health sector. Covid injections are still recommended for all children over 6 months. Questioning doctors had their licences withdrawn, many have been sent to prison. A member of the German army was just imprisoned for failing to obey the order to get injected.
Untruth #1: children need to be vaccinated against Covid-19
It turns out the RKI deemed child vaccination unnecessary, (Protocol,19/05/2021) as the virus did not seriously endanger children and was not a driver of infection waves. Note that countries like Sweden, which did not comply with the concept of a one-world (health) medicine introduced by the WHO, left schools open, and did not introduce masks, were able to demonstrate no deaths due to Covid at all, and coincidentally the Swedish population shows the lowest excess mortality rate in Europe.
Untruth #2: the Astra Zeneca ‘vaccine’ is safe
The AstraZeneca (AZ) injection was associated with dangerous side effects, contrary to the claims made by the Federal Ministry of Health. They knew early on that the AZ injection increased the risk of sinus vein thrombosis by 20 times but despite this realization, a few weeks later the then Chancellor Angela Merkel, Vice-Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, the then Health Minister Jens Spahn and Karl Lauterbach were apparently publicly injected with AstraZeneca, together with the call to the population to do the same as these politicians.
Untruth #3: the unvaccinated are dangerous
Thirdly, the government's assertion that the unvaccinated posed a danger to others was unfounded, as the RKI found no evidence of a "pandemic of the unvaccinated." Even further on 19 March 2021 in the protocols, they emphasise that “Covid-19 should not be compared with influenza, because normal influenza waves kill more people, although Covid-19 is worrying for other reasons.”
Untruth #4: masks stop the spread
Fourthly, the RKI did not recommend the FFP-2 mask requirement and the 3-G and 2-G rules. Considering that natural science has produced over 170 studies demonstrating the ineffectiveness and harm of masks and that Pfizer never demonstrated a reduced infection or reduced transmission in the approval trials, the question remains as to why these recommendations were made and why, in Germany, even today, brave doctors are sentenced to years of imprisonment for issuing mask exemptions.
Untruth #5: restrictions were justified
Another quote in the protocols from 8 January 2021, was whether the time had come to “depart from the narrative of herd immunity via vaccination” now that vaccines were actually available. A remark on 5 March 2021 showed that restrictions for the unvaccinated and as-yet-uninfected were “not technically justifiable” and contrary to World Health Organisation ethical guidelines and an extended discussion on 19 March 2021 was about why no mortality-reducing effects were yet visible after 7 million of the most vulnerable Germans had been jabbed.
Many more facts will surface shortly, but we should be on high alert as unelected organizations such as the WHO plan the next public measures in response to bird flu or Disease X.
(Note that quotes from the protocols are direct translations)
Covid-19 was no more dangerous than influenza. RKI protocol 19/03/2021, page 2352 reads: “Not yet seen that fewer old people are dying due to the vaccination effect? Is it too early? Are vaccinated people dying? The curves need to be observed closely. It is rather reassuring if the median age of deaths does not shift. The main risk of dying from COVID-19 is age. COVID-19 should not be compared to influenza, more people die in normal influenza epidemics”.
Risk elevation to a ‘pandemic’ was initiated by one single, external actor.
There was no evidence in favour of mandatory masks (not even FFP2). RKI protocol 30/10/2020, page 1716 reads: “FFP2 masks are an occupational health and safety measure. If people are not trained/qualified personnel, FFP2 masks have no added value if they are not fitted and used correctly. The limitations are clearly outlined in the document and there is no evidence to support the use of FFP2 masks outside of occupational health and safety, this could also be made available to the public. Previous studies on the effectiveness of FFP2 masks have failed due to masks not being worn or not being worn correctly, their benefit should remain limited to occupational safety of people working with infectious patients.”
Efficiency of Covid medication was known, yet not recommended. RKI Protocol 24/02/2020, page 214 reads: “New study shows chloroquine efficacy in therapy, reduces disease severity, evidence is hardening, is plausible in terms of content, is also discussed today in STAKOB TK.”
It was known that lockdowns are more dangerous than coronavirus itself.
There was no evidence for protective effect of mRNA gene therapy (vaccination). RKI Protocol 06/01/2021, page 1999 reads: “Evaluation of positive reaction in screening tests of vaccinated people: It has been reported by several organisations that positive results were observed in rapid antigen tests immediately after vaccination.”
Testing of asymptomatic people was misleading.
There was no asymptomatic transmission.
There was no evidence-based downgrading of risk assessment for political reasons.
There was no infection with Ct values of more than 30 in PCR tests.
The cohort study ‘Diamond Princess’ showing that the estimates of deaths from arch-modeller Neil Ferguson were far too high, was known but ignored.
The PCR incidence thresholds of 35 or 50 were arbitrarily set by Jens Spahn (former Minister of Health) and Head of the Chancellery, Braun. RKI protocol 03/02/2020, page 78 reads: “A positive PCR result after recovery does not necessarily mean infectiousness.”
Necessary symptoms (i.e. fever) of infection were dropped to keep case numbers artificially high. RKI protocols 23/11/2020, page 1818 reads: “Surveillance Corona-KiTa study (slides here). FluWeb: Frequency of acute respiratory diseases: below seasonal average in all age groups, decreasing trend.”
The low risk for children was known. RKI protocol 26/02/2020, page 232 reads: (Observations / results from China) Age distribution: children 2% of cases in large study, paediatric hospital confirmed all without complications; also not prevalent in transmission chains; schools, daycare centres are not in the foreground, children not important links in transmission chains; excreted in stool for a long time but unclear whether live virus; role of children rather atypically subordinate (unlike influenza), more studies need to be done.”
Politically motivated decisions
Contrary to claims that vital political decisions were based on scientific evidence, the RKI protocols reveal that these decisions were made without scientific backing. The conference of the minister presidents of the 16 federal states, led by Chancellor Angela Merkel, made decisions that ignored the scientific advice provided by the RKI.
Unjustified agitation and blame
The media played a significant role in agitating against the unvaccinated and spreading misinformation. The protocols confirm that children were not significant virus transmitters, contradicting the shaming and blaming they endured.
The harmful consequences
The leaked RKI protocols shed light on the consequences of these decisions, which caused unprecedented economic harm to the middle class and small and medium-sized businesses. Children also suffered unnecessary harm, and three-quarters of the population were subjected to novel, untested gene therapy injections, with currently at least 20 million deaths and untold damage to body systems. These revelations call for legal investigations into the authorities' actions.
Conclusion
The release of the uncensored RKI protocols has exposed the truth behind the government's handling of the pandemic in Germany and most likely all over the world. The protocols reveal that political decisions were made without scientific basis, leading to the imposition of draconian measures, total control and the spread of real misinformation. It is crucial that these revelations are thoroughly evaluated and that legal investigations are conducted to ensure accountability.
We must ensure that independent science and a decentralized medical approach that accommodates repurposed drugs, micronutrients, diet, our microbiome, and so on, should be the basis of medical measures in case of real threats. These novel gene therapy injections called covid vaccines may have modified humanity forever. We need to ensure that, as set out in the Nuremberg Code after the Second World War, free will and informed consent form the basis of any treatment, and that unethical medical experimentation and coercion never happens again.
The World Council for Health firmly stands behind a better way.
Free from conflicts of interest, we’re 100% powered by contributions from extra-ordinary men and women around the world. If you like what we do, please chip in what you can - and thank you for all your support.
This statement was drafted by WCH Health & Science Team including Team Lead, Christof Plothe, DO, Prof. Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse, and Dr Tess Lawrie.
The World Council for Health has very serious concerns about the 100-day, self-replicating GMO technology being developed in the guise of ‘vaccines’.
With the endorsement of the World Health Organization of novel 100-day GMO ‘vaccine’ technology, the production of self-replicating ‘vaccine’ products has been enabled by Arcalis in Fukushima, Japan. The company website proudly announces that it is manufacturing mRNA drugs in 100 days. See below:
An image from the Arcalis company website. Would you feel safe to be given a vaccine that took 100 days to design and manufacture?
What are self-replicating ‘vaccines’?
A self-replicating ‘vaccine’ is a pharmaceutical product that utilises gene therapy technology based on ribonucleic acid (RNA). The difference with the mRNA ‘vaccines’ that have been used during the COVID-19 pandemic is that the latter contain nanolipids that surround synthetic RNA molecules that encode an antigen (e.g. spike protein, in the case of the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’) that is intended to stimulate a specific immune response. Provided that the synthetic RNA is not reverse transcribed to DNA and is integrated in the cells’ genome (Alden et al., 2022, Doerfler et al., 2021), the foreign material should be degraded within the cell after some time[1].
However, self-replicating ‘vaccines’ contain synthetic mRNA that encodes a given antigen; it also contains mRNA that encodes an enzyme whose function is to copy the foreign mRNA. This means that the self-replicating ‘vaccines’ can continue to generate copies of the antigen-encoding mRNA for unlimited time. This allows the transfected cells to achieve a sustained production of the intended antigen, which has been hypothesised to enhance the immune response and increase the effectiveness of the ‘vaccine’ over time (Démoulins, 2024).
However, these alleged benefits have not been established experimentally. Furthermore, there is evidence that sustained antigen exposure can lead to a decreased immune response, as it can lead to unresponsiveness of lymphocyte subpopulations (Jelly-Gibbs et al., 2005; Jelly-Gibbs et al., 2000), as is known to occur during chronic viral infections (e.g. Barathan et al., 2018). In reality, optimal immune function is achieved with a short period of antigen exposure (Blair et al., 2011), while sustained antigen exposure can lead to antigenic tolerance, anergy or lymphocyte exhaustion (Anderson et al., 2006).
In addition, although the use of self-replicating mRNA for vaccine candidates was proposed thirty years ago (Zhou et al., 1994), the technology has never been used outside of pre-clinical and clinical trials as gene therapy against cancer and some infectious diseases, and even these trials started only a few years ago (Wagner & Mutschler 2023, Pollock et al., 2022). At the time of writing this article, no product based on self-amplifying mRNA has been authorized or approved by the FDA or the EMA.
However, it is likely that this may change soon: early in 2024, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare granted approval for ARCT-154, a self-amplifying mRNA (also known as sa-mRNA or sr-mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine[2]. It is therefore important to note that self-replicating mRNA ‘vaccines’ are still in the early stages of development and evaluation.
Why is this important?
Some may argue that given the technological advances of our time, scientists can quickly determine whether a new product is safe and effective or not. However, regardless of the available technology, the only way to ensure long term safety (such as effects after five or ten years, or transgenerational effects, or effects on foetal development) is to study the product over time. No technology, however modern, can accelerate the time frame needed to ensure safety.
The self-replicating mRNA ‘vaccines’ are being heralded as a game-changer given that they are intending to design and manufacture such products in 100 days[3].
Beyond the risk of quality control problems due to rapid production, as occurred for the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, reflected as differences in vaccine lots (Fürst et al., 2024) and undeclared elements that could be industrial contaminants (McKernan et al., 2023, Krutzke et al., 2022, BMJ, 2021),in general, novel genetic drug products like these require 15 years of monitoring and assessment to meet the required safety standards. It is thus simply not possible for these new self-replicating GMO products that are manufactured within 100-days to be declared safe for use any time soon.
We have already seen with the COVID-19 mRNA products that it is not a good idea to give people’s bodies a genetic recipe to make a foreign protein as it can lead to a variety of serious, debilitating diseases and, even, sudden death (Hülscher et al., 2024, Fraiman et al., 2022). However, the safety concerns go beyond the foreign protein that transfected cells produce; the synthetic mRNA is toxic to the cells and can lead to autoinflammatory and autoimmune conditions (Acevedo-Whitehouse & Bruno, 2023; Valdes Angues & Perea Bustos, 2023, Seneff et al., 2022). This can help explain the unprecedented number of adverse reactions that have been reported to official monitoring systems such as VAERS, Eudravigilance and Vigiaccess.
Another image from the Arcalis website. Are you comfortable being injected with a 'vaccine' that was created in less than a month?
What are the potential dangers of self-amplifying mRNA technology?
Self-replicating pharmaceutical GMO products are a very new and untested technology, with serious potential risks and concerns. Some of the dangers identified include:
Unintended genetic consequences: Self-replicating ‘vaccines’ involve the introduction of foreign genetic material into the body. There is therefore a possibility that the self-replicating RNA could interact with other genetic material in the body, including human chromosomes, with unexpected consequences, including altering the genetic make-up of the individual and their offspring.
Unintended protein production: Intracellular translation of synthetic mRNA molecules can lead to a process known as ribosomal frame-shifting, in which truncated or modified proteins can be produced (Mulroney et al., 2023). This can have serious health consequences, including autoimmune reactions. Furthermore, the alphavirus RNA polymerase, which is the element that is included in the self-replicating ‘vaccines’ (Low et al., 2022) has low fidelity (Poirier et al., 2016), meaning that in every replication cycle, there are likely to be errors (mutations) in the copied sequences, leading to aberrant proteins being produced.
Safety concerns: The mRNA ‘vaccine’ platforms are inherently unsafe and have not been subjected to long term safety studies (Halma et al., 2023) or to experimental studies on genotoxicity, mutagenicity, genomic integration or genomic instability (Acevedo-Whitehouse & Bruno, 2023). Self-replicating ‘vaccines’ are likely to pose the same dangers but have the added problem that they include viral RNA polymerase (Tews, 2017) which perpetuates the production of the antigen-encoding mRNA.
Ethical considerations: With self-replicating ‘vaccine’ products, people could in effect become mobile ‘vaccine’ factories with the very real possibility of transmitting or shedding the ‘vaccine’ product to others through their bodily fluids, gases and contact. Thus, the use of self-replicating GMO products as vaccines raises ethical questions, particularly regarding the potential for unintended transmission of the GMO product to individuals who have not consented to receive it. Of great concern, is that such transmissible self-replicating GMO technology lends itself to the production of bioweapons.
Conclusion
The World Council for Health has very serious concerns about the 100-day, self-replicating GMO technology being developed in the guise of ‘vaccines’. We believe an independent fact-finding mission should be undertaken to determine how the development and testing of these products in Japan has been authorised and fast-tracked given the huge risk posed by this technology to the world’s people.
References
Acevedo-Whitehouse K, & Bruno R. Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses, 2023. 171, 111015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015
Aldén M, Olofsson Falla F, Yang D, Barghouth M, Luan C, Rasmussen M, & De Marinis, Y. Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Cur Issues Mol Biol, 2022. 44(3), 1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073.
Anderson PO, Manzo BA, Sundstedt A, Minaee S, Symonds A, Khalid S, Rodriguez-Cabezas ME, Nicolson K, Li S, Wraith DC, Wang P. Persistent antigenic stimulation alters the transcription program in T cells, resulting in antigen-specific tolerance. Eur J Immunol, 2006. 36(6):1374-85. doi: 10.1002/eji.200635883.
Barathan M, Mohamed R, Yong YK, Kannan M, Vadivelu J, Saeidi A, Larsson M, Shankar EM. Viral Persistence and Chronicity in Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Role of T-Cell Apoptosis, Senescence and Exhaustion. Cells. 2018 Oct 12;7(10):165. doi: 10.3390/cells7100165.
Blair DA, Turner DL, Bose TO, Pham QM, Bouchard KR, Williams KJ, McAleer JP, Cauley LS, Vella AT, Lefrançois L. Duration of antigen availability influences the expansion and memory differentiation of T cells. J Immunol. 2011. 187(5):2310-21. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100363.
BMJ (2021). The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability BMJ 372 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n627
Démoulins T, Englezou PC, Milona P, Ruggli N, Tirelli N, Pichon C, Sapet C, Ebensen T, Guzmán CA, McCullough KC. Self-Replicating RNA Vaccine Delivery to Dendritic Cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1499:37-75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6481-9_3.
Doerfler W. Adenoviral Vector DNA- and SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccines: Possible Integration into the Human Genome - Are Adenoviral Genes Expressed in Vector-based Vaccines? Virus Res. 2021. 302:198466. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198466.
Fraiman, J., Erviti, J., Jones, M., Greenland, S., Whelan, P., Kaplan, R. M., & Doshi, P. (2022). Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults. Vaccine. 2022. 40(40), 5798–5805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.036
Fürst T, Šourek P, Krátká Z, Janošek J. Batch-dependent safety of COVID-19 vaccines in the Czech Republic and comparison with data from Denmark. Eur J Clin Invest. 2024. e14271. doi: 10.1111/eci.14271.
Halma M, Rose, J, Lawrie, T. The Novelty of mRNA Viral Vaccines and Potential Harms: A Scoping Review. MDPI 2023, 6, 220–235. https://doi.org/10.3390/j6020017
Hulscher N, Hodkinson R, Makis W, McCullough PA. Autopsy findings in cases of fatal COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. ESC Heart Fail. 2024. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14680.
Jelley-Gibbs DM, Dibble JP, Filipson S, Haynes L, Kemp RA, Swain SL. Repeated stimulation of CD4 effector T cells can limit their protective function. J Exp Med. 2005. 201(7):1101-12. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041852.
Jelley-Gibbs DM, Lepak NM, Yen M, Swain SL. Two distinct stages in the transition from naive CD4 T cells to effectors, early antigen-dependent and late cytokine-driven expansion and differentiation. J Immunol. 2000 165(9):5017-26. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.9.5017.
Krauson AJ, Casimero FVC, Siddiquee Z, & Stone JR. Duration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine persistence and factors associated with cardiac involvement in recently vaccinated patients. NPJ Vaccines, 2023. 8(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00742-7
Krutzke L, Rösler R, Allmendinger E, Engler T, Wiese S, & Kochanek S. Process- and product-related impurities in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine. ELife, 2022. 11. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78513
Low JG, de Alwis R, Chen S, Kalimuddin S, Leong YS, Mah TKL, Yuen N, Tan HC, Zhang SL, Sim JXY, Chan YFZ, Syenina A, Yee JX, Ong EZ, Sekulovich R, Sullivan BB, Lindert K, Sullivan SM, Chivukula P, Hughes SG, Ooi EE. A phase I/II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of a self-amplifying Covid-19 mRNA vaccine. NPJ Vaccines. 2022.7(1):161. doi: 10.1038/s41541-022-00590-x.
McKernan K, Helbert Y, Kane LT, & McLaughlin S. Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose . Medicinal Genomics. 2023. https://cdn-ceo-ca.s3.amazonaws.com/1i4tp3q-Sequencing%20of%20bivalent_4-11-23.pdf
Mörz M. A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19. Vaccines, 2022. 10(10), 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101651
Mulroney TE, Pöyry T, Yam-Puc JC, Rust M, Harvey RF, Kalmar L, Horner E, Booth L, Ferreira AP, Stoneley M, Sawarkar R, Mentzer AJ, Lilley KS, Smales CM, von der Haar T, Turtle L, Dunachie S, Klenerman P, Thaventhiran JED, Willis AE. N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting. Nature, 2024. 625(7993):189-194. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06800-3.
Poirier EZ, Mounce BC, Rozen-Gagnon K, Hooikaas PJ, Stapleford KA, Moratorio G, Vignuzzi M. Low-Fidelity Polymerases of Alphaviruses Recombine at Higher Rates To Overproduce Defective Interfering Particles. J Virol. 2015. 90(5):2446-54. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02921-15.
Pollock KM, Cheeseman HM, Szubert AJ, Libri V, Boffito M, Owen D, Bern H, O'Hara J, McFarlane LR, Lemm NM, McKay PF, Rampling T, Yim YTN, Milinkovic A, Kingsley C, Cole T, Fagerbrink S, Aban M, Tanaka M, Mehdipour S, Robbins A, Budd W, Faust SN, Hassanin H, Cosgrove CA, Winston A, Fidler S, Dunn DT, McCormack S, Shattock RJ, COVAC1 study Group. Safety and immunogenicity of a self-amplifying RNA vaccine against COVID-19: COVAC1, a phase I, dose-ranging trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2022. 44:101262. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101262.
Samaniego-Castruita JA, Schneider UV, Mollerup S, Leineweber TD, Weis N, Bukh J, Pedersen, MS, & Westh H. SARS‐CoV‐2 spike mRNA vaccine sequences circulate in blood up to 28 days after COVID ‐19 vaccination. APMIS, 2023. 131(3), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13294
Seneff S, Nigh G, Kyriakopoulos AM, & McCullough PA. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2022. 164, 113008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008
Valdes Angues R, Perea Bustos Y. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis. Cureus. 2023. 15(12):e50703. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50703.
Wagner A, Mutschler H. Design principles and applications of synthetic self-replicating RNAs. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2023.14(6):e1803. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1803.
Zhou X, Berglund P, Rhodes G, Parker SE, Jondal M, Liljeström P. Self-replicating Semliki Forest virus RNA as recombinant vaccine. Vaccine 1994.12(16):1510-4. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(94)90074-4.
FOOTNOTES
[1] There were no studies on pharmacokinetics done before authorizing the mRNA ‘vaccines’ and there is no experimental data on synthetic nucleoside-modified mRNA intracellular degradation times and rates in human cells. However, a series of independent studies suggest that the ‘vaccine’ mRNA could take at least 180 days to degrade (Krauson et al. 2023, Mörz et al. 2023, Samaniego-Castruita et al. 2023).
