Governments worldwide are struggling to contain a new virus that could have a huge impact on billions of lives worldwide.
The virus is called
TRUTH
Tuesday, 29 April 2025
Regime Change at the WEF – For Better or for Worse?
by Peter Koenig
On April 20, 2025, Easter Sunday, the Board of Trustees of the World Economic Forum (WEF) called for an extraordinary meeting – behind closed doors.
The Board of Trustees includes among others, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, former US Vice President Al Gore, Jordan’s Queen Rania Al Abdullah and European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde as members. BlackRock is the WEF’s most important sponsor. Thus, BlackRock’s voice must weigh accordingly.
What they debated was a new Wall Street Journal (WSJ) article, apparently based on an anonymous whistleblower letter, this time accusing, Klaus Schwab and his wife, Hilde Schwab, of misusing the WEF Foundation’s money and property for personal purposes.
Mentioned were personal massages, luxury air-travel at the WEF’s expense, for personal trips – and the use of a CHF 30-million restored historic mansion, paid for with WEF money, to be used for WEF special events, but is mostly used for Klaus Schwab and his family’s personal purposes.
Mr. Schwab apparently also used junior staff to withdraw thousands of dollars from ATM machines for his personal use. Verbally quoting the WSJ: The Schwabs, “mixed their personal affairs with the Forum’s resources.”
The Board opened an immediate investigation into these allegations. Schwab said he would take legal action against the WSJ and decided – or was told – to resign immediately from the Board’s chairmanship. He stepped back last year as President and CEO of the WEF, but assumed the Chair for the Board of Trustees with a timeline through 2027. This timeline was cut short by the whistleblower and the WSJ article.
Other WEF executives, especially the Schwabs’ children, also exited following a board probe into workplace culture, a topic that has plagued the WEF for years, but came to the fore the first time a year ago.
With immediate effect the Board decided on an interim replacement for Klaus Schwab, a former longtime President and CEO of Nestlé, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe. He was CEO and chairman of the Nestlé Group from 1997 to 2008. Brabeck was deputy chair of the WEF’s Board of Trustees.
Brabeck is not less controversial than Schwab. He was and still is a staunch defender of the idea that water is not a public good. Mr. Brabeck is perhaps best known for declaring that water is not a human right, but a market commodity. When he led Nestlé, the food giant was one of the global leaders in the privatization of water. Brabeck is also an aggressive promoter of GMOs (genetically modified organisms).
GMO food may have significant negative health effects and especially, it does not allow farmers to collect seeds from one harvest to the next. This has severe implications for farmers, especially in so-called developing countries, or the Global South.
India is a case in point, where GMO seeds were sold without telling the farmers that the plants’ seeds could not reproduce, i.e., could not be used for next year’s harvest. When the farmers realized, they could not afford buying every year GMO seeds, thousands committed suicide, as they were unable to maintain and feed their families.
Nestlé under Mr. Brabeck, was also at the forefront of a scandal about powder-milk that should replace breastfeeding.
Nestlé especially targeted Africa, where the product was introduced against healthy common breastfeeding habits. As we also know in the west, breastfeeding provides babies and children with a basic, strong immune system, which powder-milk for infants does not.
In addition, rising prices of Nestlé’s milk-powder made that women could no longer afford it, and since they did not start with breastfeeding, they did not produce breast milk. With the combination of unnatural powder-milk, lack of breastmilk and the natural immune system, many babies got sick and often died.
Mr. Brabeck is known for his anti-human and anti-Human Rights stance on many issues growing to ever-more importance in the current geo-political and economic environment we are living.
Mr. Brabeck certainly does not make the WEF a better place. Perhaps to the contrary. For sure, a number of investigations – WEF internals and externals – and law suits are already ongoing or pending.
At the outset all of this might look like the globalists agenda is gradually dismantling. Maybe it is, maybe it is not.
Just imagine for a moment a different scenario. During last Easter weekend, several “coincidences” happened basically simultaneously:
The WEF long-time Chair and founder (1971), Klaus Schwab, resigns form all charges, and the WEF embarks on a major restructuring, the result of which is not known yet;
Pope Francis gives his last benediction in his Easter message to hundreds of thousands of his followers in St. Peter’s Square in Vatican City, in Rome, and then he dies the following morning; and
Who knows what else happened on that crucial Easter weekend 2025. There are no coincidences. Easter is the celebration of resurrection. The Dark Cult, or Deep State, or whatever else you may call this evil entity which is currently pretending to run the world, is full of symbolism and rituals.
Coud it be that globalism is sensing an ever-stronger pushback by the people, so they feign a collapse, when in reality, they take the lull in people’s attention to regroup to reappear later with new much stronger strategies to take over the world?
It is like a ceasefire which is used by the weaker to re-arm and re-strategize heir aggression. This is not just a hint to the Ukraine ceasefire, but a tactic followed worldwide.
We must be aware, that a Cult movement with the monetary power they have behind and over hundred years of preparation, will not just go away. They will fight to the last world-citizen, if they are not defeated before. As Bill Gates once said – not verbatim, but by meaning – in one of his more lucid moments, “even if I disappear, the system is so strong and well prepared, it will continue the same without me”.
We, the People of the world, must make sure that the movement for a multipolar world continues, back to Human Rights and basic human values, as well as away from digitization, from the digital Gulag, will continue until we are free and sovereign people again.
And yes, it is possible, if we are aware and conscious. ————
Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst, regular author for Global Research, and a former Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020).
Peter is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also a non-resident Senior Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing.
Reading the new blood pressure guidelines - Harvard Health
If you didn't have high blood pressure before, there's a good chance you do now.
In 2017, new guidelines from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and nine other health organizations lowered the numbers for the diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure) to 130/80 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) and higher for all adults. The previous guidelines set the threshold at 140/90 mm Hg for people younger than age 65 and 150/80 mm Hg for those ages 65 and older.
Behind the numbers
Blood pressure guidelines are not updated at regular intervals. Instead, they are changed when sufficient new evidence suggests the old ones weren't accurate or relevant anymore. The goal now with the more recent guidelines is to help people address high blood pressure — and the problems that may accompany it like heart attack and stroke — much earlier.
The new guidelines stem from the 2017 results of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), which studied more than 9,000 adults ages 50 and older who had systolic blood pressure (the top number in a reading) of 130 mm Hg or higher and at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The study's aim was to find out whether treating blood pressure to lower the systolic number to 120 mm Hg or less was superior to the standard target of 140 mm Hg or less. The results found that targeting a systolic pressure of no more than 120 mm Hg reduced the chance of heart attacks, heart failure, or stroke over a three-year period.
More than blood pressure
The updated guidelines have other changes, too. First, they don't offer different recommendations for people younger or older than age 65. This is because the SPRINT study looked at all patients regardless of age and didn't break down groups above or below a certain age.
The guidelines also redefined the various categories of hypertension. It eliminated the category of prehypertension, which had been defined as systolic blood pressure of 120 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic pressure (the lower number in a reading) of 80 to 89 mm Hg. Instead, people with those readings are now categorized as having either elevated pressure (120 to 129 systolic and less than 80 diastolic) or Stage 1 hypertension (130 to 139 systolic or 80 to 89 diastolic).
A reading of 140/90 mm Hg or higher is considered Stage 2 hypertension, and anything higher than 180/120 mm Hg is hypertensive crisis.
Check your blood pressure at home
The new guidelines note that blood pressure should be measured on a regular basis and encourage people to use home blood pressure monitors. Monitors can range from $40 to $100 on average, but your insurance may cover part or all of the cost. Measure your blood pressure a few times a week and see your doctor if you notice any significant changes. Here are some tips on how to choose and use a monitor.
Choosing
Select a monitor that goes around your upper arm. Wrist and finger monitors are not as precise.
Select an automated monitor, which has a cuff that inflates itself.
Look for a digital readout that is large and bright enough to see clearly.
Consider a monitor that also plugs into your smartphone to transfer the readings to an app, which then creates a graph of your progress. Some devices can send readings wirelessly to your phone.
Using
Avoid caffeinated or alcoholic beverages 30 minutes beforehand.
Sit quietly for five minutes with your back supported and your legs uncrossed.
Support your arm so your elbow is at or near heart level.
Wrap the cuff over bare skin.
Don't talk during the measurement.
Leave the deflated cuff in place, wait a minute, then take a second reading. If the readings are close, average them. If not, repeat again and average the three readings.
Keep a record of your blood pressure readings, including the time of day.
What should you do?
If you had previously been diagnosed with high blood pressure, the current guidelines don't affect you too much, as you still need to continue your efforts to lower it through medication, diet, exercise, and weight loss. However, based on the newer study results that led to guideline changes, your doctor may recommend lowering your blood pressure goal.
The larger issue is that many people ages 65 and older suddenly find themselves diagnosed with elevated or high blood pressure, since the new normal is a whopping 20 points lower than before. Does this mean an automatic prescription for blood pressure drugs? Not necessarily.
People should consult with their doctor about first adjusting lifestyle habits, such as getting more exercise, losing weight, and following a heart-healthy diet like the DASH or Mediterranean diet.
Medications are recommended to lower blood pressure in Stage 1 hypertension if you've already had a heart attack or stroke or if your 10-year risk of a heart attack is higher than 10%. (You can find your 10-year estimation at www.cvriskcalculator.com.) For others with Stage 1 hypertension, the first action is to take lifestyle changes seriously.
Overall, the updated guidelines may help people get more involved with monitoring their blood pressure, which can hopefully prevent complications from hypertension.
The Cost of Ignoring the Root Cause of Chronic Disease. J. Mercola
The U.S. channels 90% of its $4.5 trillion annual healthcare costs toward chronic diseases, yet most of it funds profitable drugs and procedures that do not address the root cause of illness
Prescription drugs trap patients in an endless cycle of dependence. Once patients start medications for chronic conditions, they rarely stop, even when their health continues to decline
Chronic disease patients face severe financial strain; 32% have medical debt in collections and their bankruptcy rate is four times higher than that of healthy individuals
Beyond the physical toll, chronic disease impacts your mental health, strains your relationships and makes you feel isolated. Caregivers also experience stress, exhaustion and lost income
Medicine must shift from disease management to true healing. Instead of masking symptoms, the focus must be on restoring cellular function and supporting metabolic health to break free from the cycle of chronic illness
*
Chronic disease is the defining health crisis of our time. Despite medical advancements, rates of diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and neurodegenerative conditions continue to rise. The U.S. spends more on healthcare than any other country, yet people are getting sicker, not healthier.
This failure stems from conventional medicine’s narrow focus on pharmaceuticals and procedures that only prolong dependence rather than recognizing the role of mitochondrial function and cellular health in preventing and treating chronic disease. It’s time to challenge this system, expose its shortcomings, and demand a shift toward solutions that actually restore health at its foundation.
The Financial Toll of Lifelong Disease Management
The financial burden of managing chronic diseases is overwhelming, even for those with health insurance. This has made medical debt one of the most pressing economic crises in the United States today.1 The problem is not just that these conditions are expensive — it’s that they are rarely resolved. Patients are placed on lifelong prescriptions and procedures that generate billions in revenue for pharmaceutical and insurance companies while failing to restore health.
• A major study reveals chronic conditions heighten financial vulnerability — A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine2 evaluated more than 2.85 million adults and found that over 38% had at least one chronic condition. While many assume that health insurance protects against major medical expenses, their findings show that those with chronic conditions are much more likely to struggle with unpaid medical bills, delinquent debt, and even bankruptcy.
• As the number of chronic conditions increases, so does the likelihood of financial strain —Among individuals with no chronic illnesses, only 7.6% had medical debt in collections. However, that number skyrocketed to 32% for those with seven to 13 chronic conditions. This pattern was also seen in nonmedical debt in collections, which affected only 7.2% of those without chronic illness but increased to 24% among those with the most medical issues.
• Delinquent debt and poor credit scores are more common with chronic illness — Delinquent debt, meaning missed payments on any type of debt, was found among 14% of healthy individuals, compared to nearly 43% among those with multiple chronic conditions.
The financial toll of chronic illness also extends to credit scores and bankruptcy rates. Individuals with no chronic illnesses only had a 17% chance of having a low credit score, while it was 47% for those managing seven to 13 chronic conditions.
• Bankruptcy rates rise dramatically with more chronic conditions — Bankruptcy rates also climbed, with 1.7% of those with multiple chronic conditions filing for bankruptcy, a fourfold increase compared to the 0.4% of healthy individuals who had to take that step. Beyond the likelihood of accumulating debt, the actual amount of medical debt in collections also increased with each additional chronic condition.
• Unpaid medical debt rises sharply with more chronic illnesses — Among those with no chronic conditions, the average amount of unpaid medical bills in collections was $784. For those with multiple chronic illnesses, that number rose to $1,252. This suggests that even with insurance, the out-of-pocket costs of ongoing treatments, medications and specialist visits quickly add up, leaving patients financially overwhelmed.
The Soaring Economic Burden of Chronic Disease
Chronic disease is the leading cause of healthcare spending in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),3 90% of the nation’s $4.5 trillion annual healthcare costs go toward treating chronic illnesses, averaging $13,493 per person.4 These expenses include doctor visits, hospital stays, surgeries, and long-term prescription drug use.
• Lost productivity from chronic disease also results in billions of dollars in economic losses each year — In 2022, the indirect costs of diabetes in the U.S. economy were estimated to be $106.3 billion.5 Meanwhile, cardiovascular disease alone is projected to cost the U.S. $1.1 trillion annually by 2035.6
• Chronic illness creates generational financial strain — When declining health forces workers to leave their jobs, the financial strain also affects their entire family. Spouses and children often become full-time caregivers and sacrifice their own careers and financial security in the process.
As medical expenses pile up and income dwindles, families are left trapped in a cycle of economic instability that stretches across generations and makes financial recovery a challenge.
• Even government programs are crumbling under the overwhelming cost of chronic disease —The 2024 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) financial report7 reveals that Medicare alone accounts for 22% of all U.S. healthcare spending, while Medicaid contributes another 17%. In total, these programs handle over a billion fee-for-service claims each year and represent approximately 13% of total federal outlays.
• Most Medicare and Medicaid funds are likely spent on chronic illness care — Given that chronic disease is responsible for 90% of U.S. healthcare expenditures, it is likely that a substantial portion of these Medicare and Medicaid funds are dedicated to managing chronic conditions.
More than a decade ago, Medicare was already spending vastly different amounts depending on how many chronic conditions a person had.
• Medicare costs escalate dramatically with the number of chronic conditions — In 2010, the average Medicare beneficiary with no or just one chronic illness cost the system $2,025 per year. But for those with two or three conditions, that number jumped to $5,698.
Patients with four or five chronic diseases cost an average of $12,174, while those with six or more racked up a staggering $32,658 annually.8 With chronic illness rates climbing higher every year, it’s safe to assume these figures have only grown worse.
• The system profits from lifelong treatment rather than curing disease — The staggering cost of chronic disease is a reflection of a medical system designed to manage symptoms instead of helping you heal, with billions funneled into medications, surgeries, and treatments that ensure a steady flow of profits for pharmaceutical companies and the medical industry. Even the best-selling drugs in the world aren’t designed to treat disease but to keep you dependent.
• Best-selling medications make billions while diseases persist or worsen —Lipitor, a cholesterol-lowering drug, has made over $150 billion in sales,9 yet heart disease remains the leading cause of death. Similarly, insulin costs continue to climb,10 even though Type 2 diabetes is largely preventable with diet and lifestyle changes.
As long as the system profits from keeping people on medication, prevention and real solutions will be ignored. If you want to break free, you have to start looking beyond conventional medicine.
Patient Burnout — When Medications Become a Life Sentence
The endless cycle of seeking relief without healing is the defining reality for millions trapped in the modern medical system. A patient battling chronic pain, for instance, may begin with a mild prescription for relief, only to find themselves escalating to stronger medications as their condition worsens.
• Opioid prescriptions increase over time but don’t improve patient outcomes — A study published in Pain Medicine11 found that among chronic non-cancer pain patients, opioid prescription rates jumped from 59.6% at baseline to 74.3% over two years, with a disturbing 71% of users remaining on the drugs long-term.
Strong opioid use more than doubled, rising from 13% to 31%. Despite this surge in prescriptions, patients continued to report severe pain and high levels of daily life interference.
• Long-term opioid users experience more pain and rarely discontinue use — Additionally, the study found that opioid users were more likely to experience continuous pain and disability compared to those who were not prescribed opioids. Most notably, only 1% of patients successfully discontinued opioid use over the two-year period, showing how once patients start opioid therapy, they rarely stop, even when their pain does not improve.12
• Opioids worsen pain over time by lowering the body’s pain threshold — Research has also demonstrated that long-term opioid use leads to opioid-induced hyperalgesia, a condition where your nervous system becomes more sensitive to pain rather than less.
Instead of providing lasting relief, opioids rewire your pain pathways, lowering your pain threshold and making discomfort feel even more intense. The very drugs meant to ease your suffering actually exacerbate it over time and trap you in a cycle of increasing pain and drug dependency.13
• For those navigating mental health disorders, the pattern is eerily similar — Brooke Siem, writing for The Washington Post,14 recounts how she spent nearly half her life on antidepressants, never once challenged by a doctor to reconsider the necessity of these medications. Like so many others, she accepted the notion that her only choices were to “cope with depression or cope with antidepressants.”15
Years later, she found herself staring out of her Manhattan high-rise window, contemplating suicide despite the drugs that were supposed to keep her stable. It was only when she withdrew from the medications — which involved an excruciating, months-long process riddled with withdrawal symptoms — that she realized the depth of her dependency.16
• Brooke’s story is unfortunately not a one-off case — It’s estimated that nearly 15.5 million Americans have been on antidepressants for over five years, often without reevaluation.17
Moreover, a 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis published in The Lancet Psychiatry18found that approximately 15% of individuals who discontinued antidepressants experienced withdrawal symptoms directly caused by discontinuation. In about 3% of patients, these symptoms were severe.
• Polypharmacy reduces quality of life by worsening mental and physical health — A 2021 study in Patient Related Outcome Measures19 also found that patients with a high Drug Burden Index (DBI) — which measures exposure to medications with sedative (e.g., benzodiazepines, opioids) and anticholinergic (e.g., some antihistamines, antidepressants, bladder medications) effects — reported significantly worse psychological well-being, functional limitations and an overall diminished quality of life.
In other words, the more medications a person takes, the more likely they are to experience cognitive impairment, fatigue, and emotional distress. Even when these drugs are prescribed with good intentions, their long-term effects often make daily life more difficult, not better.
The Hidden Costs of Chronic Illness — Mental, Emotional and Social Strain
If you’re living with a chronic illness, you already know that the struggle goes far beyond physical symptoms — the mental and emotional toll can be just as overwhelming. According to a study published in Middle East Current Psychiatry,2068.7% of chronic disease patients experience stress, 51.1% suffer from anxiety, and 58.8% struggle with depression.
• Psychological strain is especially severe with multiple chronic conditions — These conditions are particularly prevalent among individuals with cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, cancer, respiratory illnesses, degenerative diseases, chronic kidney disease, and chronic liver disorders.
The Patient Related Outcome Measures study21further confirms that those with three or more chronic conditions are significantly more likely to experience poorer psychological well-being.
• The burden of chronic disease affects patients’ families, too — Research shows that 95% of chronically ill patients rely on a caregiver, usually a family member, to help with daily tasks, medications, and medical appointments.
The demands of caregiving can quickly become overwhelming, leading to exhaustion and emotional strain. Many caregivers struggle with constant fatigue, lack of support, and the heavy responsibility of managing someone else’s health while trying to keep up with their own lives.22
• Moreover, chronic illness leaves you feeling isolated — Fatigue, pain, or mobility issues make it difficult to engage in social activities and lead individuals to withdraw from gatherings and hobbies they once enjoyed. Some friendships fade as plans get canceled and invitations stop coming. The loneliness that follows makes depression worse, creating a cycle that fuels both emotional and physical decline.23
• Chronic illness strains marriages, relationships and even children — If you’re in a marriage or long-term partnership, the shift from equal partners to patient and caregiver can be difficult to navigate.
Research24 shows that chronic illness increases the risk of divorce and relationship breakdowns, often due to financial stress, emotional exhaustion, and a loss of intimacy. If you have children, they may struggle emotionally or academically, as the focus of the household shifts toward managing your condition.25
Ultimately, chronic disease affects every aspect of living. As long as the medical system continues to focus only on symptom management, millions will remain stuck in a cycle that chips away at their quality of life.
Conventional Medicine’s Blind Spot
Modern medicine prides itself on advancements in pharmaceuticals and surgical interventions, yet it has continuously overlooked the most fundamental factor in health — cellular function. Few researchers understood this better than the late Dr. Ray Peat, a biologist and pioneer in bioenergetic medicine and human metabolism, whose work challenged nearly every mainstream dietary and metabolic dogma.
• Cellular energy is the foundation of health —Peat’s research on bioenergetic medicine, which became the foundation of my book “Your Guide to Cellular Health,” emphasizes the central role of cellular energy in disease prevention and health restoration. He rejected the low-carb approach, arguing instead that carbohydrates are essential for fueling mitochondrial function and metabolic health.
• Low-carb diets may harm mitochondrial health by restricting glucose — I was once among those who promoted a low-carb diet, but Peat’s work opened my eyes to the reality that mitochondria thrive on glucose, and that denying your body this essential fuel worsens the very conditions low-carb diets claim to treat.
Instead of promoting caloric restriction and macronutrient avoidance, Peat’s work demonstrates that adequate carbohydrate intake fuels energy production, lowers stress hormones, and supports thyroid function.26
• Peat warned against seed oils and their harmful metabolic effects — Peat was also one of the most vocal critics of polyunsaturated fats (PUFs) found in seed oils, long before mainstream medicine acknowledged their risks.
His research demonstrated how excess linoleic acid, a primary component of seed oils, disrupts mitochondrial function and promotes inflammation.27 While the medical community continues to promote vegetable oils as “heart-healthy,” the bioenergetic model reveals their devastating impact on metabolism.
• Important research like Peat’s has been ignored for not aligning with profit — This is just one instance where groundbreaking research has been systematically ignored in favor of profit-driven dietary guidelines.
Peat’s insights have profound implications for conditions ranging from hypothyroidism to neurodegenerative diseases, yet they remain largely unrecognized by modern medicine. It’s no surprise that conventional medicine dismissed Peat’s work as either too obscure or unworthy of serious clinical consideration, subjecting it to censorship and ridicule.
• The medical industry resists change that could reduce reliance on drugs — This deliberate suppression limited its reach, much like the work of the pioneering researchers he built upon. There is no financial motivation to promote dietary and lifestyle interventions that restore mitochondrial function, reduce pharmaceutical reliance, and reverse chronic disease. After all, the medical industry is structured around profitable treatments rather than disease prevention.
As a result, promising research on cellular health and metabolic therapies remains on the fringes of healthcare, while patients are left to navigate the system on their own. Until the medical establishment shifts its focus to supporting mitochondrial function, addressing nutritional deficiencies, and eliminating toxic exposures, the chronic disease epidemic will continue to spiral out of control. The real solutions to health are not hidden — they are simply ignored.
A Wakeup Call — The Healthcare System Is in Desperate Need of Change
Modern medicine is failing the very people it was meant to help. Chronic disease has reached epidemic levels, yet the healthcare system’s only response is more drugs, more procedures and more expensive interventions — none of which address the root causes of disease.
Your body isn’t lacking pharmaceuticals; it’s deprived of the essential conditions needed for optimal cellular function. Poor nutrition, metabolic dysfunction, environmental toxins and chronic stress are the real drivers of modern disease. Yet, these factors are overlooked in favor of high-cost, high-profit interventions that do nothing to reverse illness at the cellular level.
This cycle does not have to continue. Real health is possible, but it requires a shift from managing illness to restoring function at the cellular level. Instead of masking symptoms, medicine must prioritize the conditions that allow the body to heal itself. The good news is that solutions already exist. Research in bioenergetics and metabolic therapies is paving the way for a future where chronic disease is no longer the norm.
The human body is incredibly resilient when given the right tools, and healing is within reach for those willing to step outside the conventional model. By shifting the focus toward cellular health, the future of medicine can finally move beyond disease management and toward real, lasting vitality.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About the Root Cause of Chronic Disease
Q: Why does the U.S. spend so much on healthcare but see worsening chronic disease outcomes?
A: Despite allocating 90% of its $4.5 trillion annual healthcare budget to chronic illnesses, the U.S. continues to see rising rates of conditions like heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. The reason? Most spending goes toward profitable pharmaceutical treatments and surgeries that do not address the underlying cellular dysfunction. Instead of supporting healing, these interventions promote lifelong dependence and fail to reverse disease progression.
Q: How does chronic illness impact patients financially and emotionally?
A: Chronic illness causes severe financial distress, even for those with insurance. Patients with multiple conditions are four times more likely to file for bankruptcy, with average unpaid medical debt rising from $784 (no illness) to $1,252 (multiple conditions).
Beyond finances, patients and their families face intense emotional strain, stress, isolation, and relationship breakdowns. Caregivers, often family members, endure burnout and lost income as they juggle daily care duties.
Q: Why are prescription medications like opioids and antidepressants problematic for chronic conditions?
A: Prescription drugs often become a life sentence rather than a path to healing. Studies show that patients rarely discontinue opioids, even when their pain doesn’t improve, due to increased sensitivity to pain (opioid-induced hyperalgesia).
Similarly, long-term antidepressant use is widespread, with 15.5 million Americans on them for over 5 years, often without reevaluation. Withdrawal symptoms are common and sometimes severe, and polypharmacy worsens overall mental and physical well-being.
Q: What are the “hidden costs” of chronic illness beyond physical symptoms?
A: Chronic illness takes a deep toll on mental, emotional, and social health. Nearly 70% of patients suffer from stress, anxiety, or depression, particularly those with multiple conditions. Social withdrawal, loneliness, and strained marriages and parent-child relationships are common.
The emotional burden also extends to caregivers, who experience fatigue and diminished quality of life. The system’s focus on symptom management, rather than true healing, only worsens these outcomes.
Q: What approach can help me break the cycle of chronic illness and dependence?
A: Healing begins by addressing the root causes at the cellular level. Prioritizing mitochondrial health, adequate glucose intake, reduced exposure to seed oils, and nutrient-rich diets supports the body’s ability to restore itself. This approach moves beyond managing symptoms, aiming instead to rebuild energy production, balance stress hormones, and reduce pharmaceutical reliance — leading to lasting health instead of chronic dependency.
*
Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.
Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.
Help STOP the COVID Injections: Call2Halt19
Join me and many others in demanding a halt to the deadly genetic injections
A growing alliance of scientists, doctors, and concerned citizens—myself included—has signed the Call2Halt19 open letter. This urgent appeal is already being delivered to provincial governments and will be presented to Canada’s new federal leaders after the April 28th election.
Take Action
Canadian and international researchers and professionals please review the letter, add your signature, and share it with others.
Everyone, please download the letter, send it to your politicians, share it on your platforms and social media, and invite other researchers and professionals to add their signature.
The COVID-19 genetic injections, falsely marketed as “safe and effective vaccines,” have caused unprecedented global harm. Despite growing awareness of their dangers, these products remain in circulation—continuing to injure, disable, and kill. These mRNA injections are not effective in preventing infection or transmission, and they have caused more adverse events than any other medical product in recorded history.
A Call for Public Inquiry
The Call2Halt19 letter demands a fully independent and transparent investigation into the regulatory failures that led to the approval and continued use of these injections. Such an inquiry is essential to exposing the corruption and criminal negligence that allowed this public health disaster to unfold.
Scientific Assessment Now
The letter also calls for immediate investigation into unresolved safety risks, including:
Residual plasmid DNA
Aberrant protein production
IgG4 immune tolerance shifts
These mechanisms may be driving the alarming rise in cancers, sudden deaths, and excess mortality observed worldwide since the injections’ rollout.
Join the Fight for Health and Justice
This is not merely a medical issue—it is a human rights emergency. Share the letter. Inform your representatives. Encourage others to speak out. Together, we can halt this campaign and begin the work of healing and accountability.
Thank you for standing up for truth, health, and freedom.
